Msi Ge75 Raider Gaming Laptop - 10th Gen Intel Core I7-10750h - Geforce Rtx 2060 - 1080p Review

MSI's GE75 Raider (starts at $1,749; $2,999 equally tested) is a high-end 17.3-inch gaming laptop. This model raises the bar over the approachable GE73 Raider, integrating much-improved gaming performance into a sleeker design. A half dozen-cadre processor and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 graphics card in our topped-out tester take no trouble pushing triple-digit frames-per-2nd (fps) in today'south AAA titles. Paired with a 1080p/144Hz display, this MSI makes an platonic platform for esports titles and other fast-activity games. The performance leaves petty room for complaint, merely intrusive fan noise, a lack of Nvidia G-Sync back up, and extremely brief bombardment life tarnish its entreatment. Indeed, MSI's ain GS75 Stealth ($2,774.00 at Newegg) , with a thinner and lighter pattern, style improve bombardment, and near-identical gaming functioning remains our elevation pick for a premium 17.3-inch gamer.

Time for a Makeover

The GE75 Raider is second to MSI's flagship GT75 Titan ($two,774.00 at Newegg) in performance (and price); the GT75 packs a more powerful Intel Core i9-8950HK processor versus this tester's Intel Core i7-8750H. For a more portable option, the GS75 Stealth is just 0.75 inch thick and under five pounds, with less storage expansion the primal trade-off. Meanwhile, the GL73 is the budget choice, offering up to GeForce RTX 2060 GPUs.

Our Experts Take Tested 130 Products in the Laptops Category in the Past Year

Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to assist you make better buying decisions. (See how nosotros test.)

Similar Products

The new GE75 Raider went on a serious diet. At ane.one by xv.vii by 10.six inches (HWD), its measurements are trimmer in every dimension than the approachable GE73 Raider. It's lighter, too, at simply 5.8 pounds instead of 6.8 pounds.

Much of the size and weight reduction is related to the thin-bezel display on the GE75 Raider, effectively making information technology not much larger than a 15.half dozen-inch notebook with a thicker bezel. I'm all for this trend in notebook design, as information technology results in a cleaner look and improved portability. MSI was still able to fit the webcam on meridian of the display in its rightful place, which isn't a guarantee with notebooks that shrink the bezels. Alas, the camera's tiny sensor and low 720p resolution (I'd really similar to see 1080p in the twelvemonth 2019, please and thank you) make for muddy selfies, even in the all-time of lighting.

MSI'south backlit dragon shield logo and flanking, red-striped ridges on the lid ensure that the GE75 Raider is recognized equally a gaming notebook from 50 paces...

The look seems to strike a happy medium between too much and likewise lilliputian, fortunately without a side of polarizing pattern elements. Information technology isn't as attention-grabbing as the likes of the adventurous Alienware Area-51m, or some of Acer's Predator-branded gaming notebooks.

On the materials front, MSI has moved abroad from the brushed-aluminum await it so oft used on its premium gaming notebooks. The matte-finish aluminum on the GE75 Raider feels better-quality and is easier to clean. It's mostly for aesthetics, covering the hat backing and the peak of the chassis. The chassis has minimal lateral flex despite its plastic framing. The fit and finish is expert, with consistently minimal gaps between parts.

Dig Those Colorful Keys

The SteelSeries-designed keyboard on the GE75 Raider is a step above the similar-looking keyboards on less-expensive MSI gaming notebooks, similar the GF63 8RD ($2,774.00 at Newegg) .

This one offers per-key RGB (16.7-meg-colour) backlighting instead of single-color. Its membrane keys deliver friendly feedback via plenty of up-and-downwardly travel, although the tactile feel isn't in the same league equally the mechanical switches of the bulky MSI GT75 Titan. The keypresses on the GE75 Raider are much quieter, though.

Gamers should have no upshot with the keyboard layout on the GE75 Raider. Avid text editors, on the other hand, might accept issue with things like the 2-thirds-size number-pad keys, and the arrow keys non being separated into their own cluster. The lack of a left Windows central is deceptively off-putting, as the preinstalled MSI Dragon Center software allows y'all to bandy the Fn (Function) key on the left with the Windows key functionality on the correct, or only disable the Windows central entirely.

I got around the lack of dedicated Home and End keys using the preinstalled SteelSeries Engine software, respectively mapping them to the seldom-used Scroll Lock and Interruption Pause keys. The software also allows you to create Fn-key combos...

They're not as handy as defended macro keys, which the GE75 Raider lacks, but they are an innovative style to add functionality. The software can save your keyboard lighting and key settings in an unlimited number of profiles.

Moving on, the spacious touchpad is of the traditional variety, with dedicated left- and correct-click buttons...

The buttons brand a louder audio than I prefer when pressed. Gamers and other separate-mouse users will be glad to know the touchpad tin easily be disabled (or re-enabled) by pressing Fn+F3.

144Hz Is Refreshing...Just Where's Chiliad-Sync?

All GE75 Raider configurations include the same 17.3-inch display. Its combination of a 144Hz refresh charge per unit and a 1080p (1,920-past-ane,080-pixel) resolution is ideal for fast-paced esports titles.

Information technology'due south most unfortunate, and then, that the brandish lacks support for Nvidia K-Sync engineering science, especially at the price range of our maxed-out exam unit. (Run into our Best Graphics Cards for Apex Legends feature for the run-down on why monitors affair for esports.)

Just about every other aspect of the display on the GE75 Raider earns a thumbs-upwardly. The panel's in-airplane switching (IPS) engineering science provides wide viewing angles, while the anti-glare surface nullifies reflections. The brightness and color are very good; MSI claims the panel covers 72 per centum of the NTSC color gamut, which is well higher up the norm for a notebook brandish.

Yes, Please: Light-Upward USB Ports

A feature I've seen (and would similar to continue seeing) on MSI'due south gaming notebooks is illuminated USB Type-A ports...

On this model, two of them reside on the left edge (both version iii.0), along with a full-size SD card reader and the power adapter's socket. (Kudos to MSI for using a full-size SD menu reader, as opposed to microSD.) The USB ports' brightness tin can be inverse or turned off in the MSI Dragon Center software. Some other illuminated USB Type-A port sits on the left edge...

It'southward joined past a cable-lockdown notch, a Killer E2500 Ethernet jack, HDMI ii.0b and mini-DisplayPort video-out connectors, a USB Type-C 3.1 port, and dissever headphone and microphone jacks. Discover the large cooling frazzle vents on either side of the chassis.

For wireless, the GE75 Raider uses a Killer 1550i card supporting the 802.11ac band. The preinstalled Killer Control Heart software gives you lot some control over network traffic; for instance, you tin prioritize game-related traffic to assistance continue your latency consequent. Bluetooth 5 connectivity is also built-in.

A Config Topped Out for Gaming

The $2,999 GE75 Raider-023 configuration I'm testing is the top one of the GE75 Raider listed for availability in the US. I saw it discounted to $ii,599 on Amazon equally I was typing this. The six other configurations, which start at $i,749, share nigh everything except the graphics chip, retentiveness, and storage drive. The base model includes a GeForce RTX 2060 6GB GPU, 16GB of retentivity, and twin storage drives (a 256GB boot SSD, plus a 1TB difficult bulldoze). Our tester, meanwhile, tops out every specification with 32GB of memory, a GeForce RTX 2080 8GB graphics carte, two 512GB SSDs in RAID 0 (which bear witness upwardly equally a unmarried drive in Windows), and a 2TB hard bulldoze. The powerful Intel Core i7-8750H vi-core processor I mentioned before is standard beyond configurations.

I compared the GE75 Raider to the following gaming notebooks in our comparison charts...

All except the xv.6-inch Acer Predator Triton 500 accept a 17.3-inch display. Considering they share a Core i7-8750H processor and GeForce RTX 2080-based graphics, it's tempting to assume the performance of this lot won't vary all that much. The following benchmark results, though, will refute that. Allow the showdown begin.

PCMark x and 8 are holistic functioning suites adult by the PC benchmark specialists at UL (formerly Futuremark). The PCMark 10 test we run simulates different real-world productivity and content-creation workflows. Nosotros use it to appraise overall arrangement functioning for office-centric tasks such as word processing, spreadsheet work, spider web browsing, and videoconferencing. The test generates a proprietary numeric score; college numbers are meliorate.

PCMark eight, meanwhile has a Storage subtest that we use to assess the speed of the drive subsystem. This score is too a proprietary numeric score; once again, higher numbers are better.

Scores north of 5,000 points in PCMark 10 mean a seriously fast PC, where the MSI GE75 Raider seems to fit in just fine. I expected it might take outdone its competitors in the PCMark 8 Storage test, given it'due south running a pair of PCI Express SSDs in RAID 0, simply it didn't seem to thing. The MSI GS75 Stealth scored in line here with the other units because the PCMark 8 Storage suite doesn't brand much stardom betwixt high-end SSDs. Scores in this range simply illustrate that, yeah, you have a cutting-border kick-drive state of affairs.

Next is Maxon's CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 test, which is fully threaded to make use of all available processor cores and threads. Cinebench stresses the CPU rather than the GPU to render a complex epitome. The event is a proprietary score indicating a PC's suitability for processor-intensive workloads.

We besides run a custom Adobe Photoshop image-editing benchmark. Using an early 2018 release of the Creative Cloud version of Photoshop, we use a series of 10 circuitous filters and furnishings to a standard JPEG test image. Nosotros time each functioning and, at the stop, add upward the total execution time. As with Handbrake, lower times are better hither. The Photoshop test stresses CPU, storage subsystem, and RAM, simply it can also take advantage of almost GPUs to speed up the process of applying filters, and so systems with powerful graphics fries or cards may come across a boost.

The Cinebench R15 test reveals unexpected inconsistency among these units, given that they all apply the same Intel Core i7-8750H six-core chip. These processor-operation differences weren't credible in the before PCMark 10 test. It'southward more likely that ability and/or thermal throttling is affecting them all to some degree. The smaller chassis of the Acer Predator Triton 500 means it has the least thermal headroom, potentially explaining its lower score. The Photoshop times, on the other paw, testify an even playing field; that examination doesn't demand as much of the CPU, and all these machines take enough of retentiveness (16GB or more than) and fast SSD-based storage. This exam likewise comprises a series of minor steps with cooldowns between, meaning there isn't as much of a sustained thermal load as at that place is in Cinebench.

Graphics Tests

3DMark measures relative graphics muscle by rendering sequences of highly detailed, gaming-way 3D graphics that emphasize particles and lighting. We run two different 3DMark subtests, Sky Diver and Burn down Strike, which are suited to different types of systems. Both are DirectX 11 benchmarks, only Heaven Diver is more than suited to laptops and midrange PCs, while Fire Strike is more demanding and made for loftier-end PCs to strut their stuff. The results are proprietary scores.

Adjacent up is another constructed graphics test, this time from Unigine Corp. Similar 3DMark, the Superposition test renders and pans through a detailed 3D scene and measures how the system copes. In this case, it's rendered in the company's eponymous Unigine engine, offering a different 3D workload scenario than 3DMark, for a second opinion on the machine'south graphical prowess. We nowadays two Superposition results, run at the 720p Depression and 1080p Loftier presets.

The more than resource-intense 3DMark Burn down Strike benchmark is a head-scratcher for the MSI GE75 Raider. It uses a full-power variant of the GeForce RTX 2080 graphics card, not a Max-Q version like the residual of the group, but information technology performs no ameliorate. The Superposition test shows the GE75 dominating at the 1080p Loftier preset, merely that cursory victory didn't follow it to our real-world gaming tests.

Real-Globe Gaming Tests

The synthetic tests in a higher place are helpful for measuring general 3D aptitude, but it's hard to beat full retail video games for judging gaming performance. Far Weep 5 and Rise of the Tomb Raider are both modern, high-fidelity titles with born benchmarks that illustrate how a arrangement handles real-world video games at various settings.

These games' criterion tests are run on both the moderate and maximum graphics quality presets (Normal and Ultra for Far Cry 5, Medium and Very Loftier for Ascent of the Tomb Raider) at 1080p (and native resolution, if dissimilar) to judge performance for a given system. The results are also provided in frames per second. Far Cry v is DirectX 11 based, while Rise of the Tomb Raider can be flipped to DX12, which we do for the benchmark.

Scoring nigh or over the triple-digit frames-per-second threshold in these titles is normally an achievement, but I expected more from the GE75 Raider. The thinner and lighter GS75 Stealth matches information technology in Rise of the Tomb Raider, and bests it in Far Cry 5. The non-Max-Q status of the GeForce RTX 2080 graphics menu in the GE75 Raider doesn't seem to help it here.

Video Playback Battery Rundown Examination

Afterward fully recharging the laptop, we set up the car in ability-salvage mode (as opposed to balanced or high-performance mode) and make a few other bombardment-conserving tweaks in preparation for our unplugged video rundown test. (Nosotros besides turn Wi-Fi off, putting the laptop in Aeroplane manner.) In this test, we loop a video—a locally stored 720p file of the Blender Foundation'south open up-source short picture Tears of Steel—with screen brightness set at 50 percent and volume at 100 percent until the organisation conks out.

The GE75 Raider takes the dubious trophy for shortest bombardment runtime I've seen in a while. I ran this test multiple times, even experimenting with unlike power plans outside our standard testing regimen, but the numbers were stubborn.

I'd like to see at least three to four hours from a modern gaming laptop. As it stands, yous'd be lucky to make information technology through a Hollywood flick without lugging around the GE75 Raider'south rather beefy power adapter. Meanwhile, MSI's GS75 Stealth has fantastic bombardment life for a 17.three-inch gaming notebook.

Under the Thermal Scope

I subjected our GE75 Raider to a xx-infinitesimal run through the 3DMark Time Spy stress exam, a time more than long plenty to bring its interior components and outside surfaces upwardly to temperature. I did my testing in a relatively absurd room at 65 degrees F. Let'due south start with the thermal images, courtesy of a FLIR One Pro...

The temperature of the keyboard and surrounding surfaces peaked at 108 degrees F. Ideally, I'd like to see 100 degrees F or less, just there just aren't a whole lot of places for the heat to dissipate in a chassis like this. These temperatures won't hurt your hands, simply they will experience hot.

The underside shows similar temperatures...

The purple/cool temperature squares near the bottom of the image are the intake vents for the ii cooling fans within the chassis, which you lot tin can see hither...

These fans e'er seemed to exist running while I was using the notebook. Under gaming load or benchmark stress, the dissonance they make is intrusive. Recall twice before trying to play games on the GE75 Raider anywhere quietness is valued; I wasn't the only one who could selection out its fans across a medium-size room.

The fan noise isn't for goose egg, though. The Core i7-8750H processor topped out at 88 degrees C during the testing, which is under its maximum rated temperature. Meanwhile, the GeForce RTX 2080 reached only 76 degrees C. I'd consider that fine for any gaming notebook with a high-powered graphics processor, especially one that'due south on the thin side. Here's how the core frequency and temperature of the graphics card behaved during the stress examination...

The fluctuation in the core clock (the blue line) is largely a effect of the GPU Heave iv.0 technology built into the GeForce RTX 2080, which dynamically adjusts the core clock based on power and thermal conditions. Both were favorable; the GeForce RTX 2080 variant in the GE75 Raider is rated for a base clock of 1,380MHz, and a boost clock of ane,590MHz, but it averaged ane,663MHz in this test. It'south not uncommon for gaming notebooks to fail to dip into their boost clocks far (or at all) due to thermal restrictions, then MSI did a respectable job here of keeping the temperatures under control. The consistency in both the temperature and core clock is perhaps more important than anything, every bit the performance doesn't drop off over time.

A Tempting Value, But at a Price

The MSI GE75 Raider is, as far as pricey gaming notebooks get, a respectable value. The GeForce RTX 2080-based configurations start at $2,699, which is almost the to the lowest degree you can expect to spend for a machine with that elite-class graphics fleck. Our $2,999 tester was on sale for several hundred less online as this review was published, which is a lot of hardware for the money.

That said, while our GE75 Raider performed fine in our tests, it didn't put up quite the performance pyrotechnics we expected. Despite its full-power GeForce RTX 2080 graphics card, it was matched or, in some cases, beaten by MSI'southward own thinner, lighter GS75 Stealth and its Max-Q variant of the GeForce RTX 2080. The GS75 Stealth also delivers far improve battery life; the sub-two-hour time we clocked from the GE75 Raider is equally short as any in recent memory.

Loud fan noise further reduces the appeal of the GE75 Raider, though to its credit, its cooling solution did go along it running at acceptable temperatures while gaming. On the upside, the GE75 Raider offers better storage expansion than the GS75 Stealth (mainly, from the addition of a ii.5-inch bay) and is about $100 less expensive for a comparable configuration. Otherwise, the GE75 Raider is largely overshadowed by its thinner sibling, which remains our tiptop pick for a premium 17.3-inch gaming notebook.

MSI GE75 Raider

The Bottom Line

MSI's GE75 Raider slims downwards and adds performance oomph in this GeForce RTX-based iteration, but this gaming laptop's loud fans and lack of G-Sync reduce its entreatment for discerning players.

Like What Y'all're Reading?

Sign upwards for Lab Report to get the latest reviews and top production advice delivered correct to your inbox.

This newsletter may comprise advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at whatever fourth dimension.

wilkersontrablinever.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/msi-ge75-raider

Bagikan Artikel ini